I don’t believe we should be pairing to ensure that one person in each match has the expansion though. Pair as normal, and if no one in that game has the expansion then they can just play without it.
I have it
I have it
First seven used as table starters (response order seems as good a randomizer as any to me) with the remaining table placements randomized via random.org.
Table headers, please send friend requests as needed and then start a 3p game with “New Worlds” and “Gathering Storm”
PS. Happy racing!
Reinstalled for a new friend code. I dislike friend codes…
My friend code in case someone needs it - 8MG76XKK
And sorry for the late response, I have all expansions
Prior to Patchwork, we were being matched up based on our total points in the decathlon. Once Snotty stepped down, it looks like Patchwork was randomly paired with no regard to the standings. In my opinion, we should go back to having ranked pairings again.
Are we on hold then or should I still send out invites for my table?
I’m willing to fix the pairings tonight, but if no one else cares, I won’t bother. Any opinions?
- Random pairings are fine.
- Go back to pairing based on ranking.
- I don’t care.
Standings after 4 rounds:
Pairings would be as shaded.
Keep in mind, pairing based on standings generally keeps the field closer together. Because of random pairing pairing for Patchwork, 2 of the top 3 picked up 4 points, and only 1 person in the bottom half picked up 4 points.
My friend code is: 342EWXCC
Friend code: 2I22BAVV