I’m uncertain, as well, as to how effective it would be in aiding Holocaust deniers. My understanding of their concern is that deniers may try to focus on this fiction and ignore the facts, which is a reasonable concern.
I recall the movie “Denial”, about the trial in the UK with the burden of proof on the accuser on libel, with the “no holes, no holocaust” slogan, so perhaps they are sensitized to a new “no chess, no holocaust” slogan? I dunno, I wasn’t in the UK for the Irving court proceedings so don’t have personal knowledge of how the press portrayed it.
For myself, I support their criticism that:
Invent an non-existing camp and Nazi atrocities perpetrated there. If you however use a real place, respect it’s history and suffering of its victims.
I do appreciate the creator/executive producer’s good intentions in using fictitious tattoo numbers, but I disagree on not using a fictitious camp for the fictitious chess scene.
As far as the entertainment industry is concerned, they are likely thrilled that this story was linked to on the “front page” of the USA Today website: Auschwitz Museum upset with made-up scene in Amazon’s ‘Hunters’: ‘Dangerous foolishness’