Into another mirror-world morning

I agree with you on the stopping the conflict. Israel should get back to their bit and Hamas should hand back the hostages. And while they (Israel) are at it they should return all the people they are holding, and Palestine should kick Hamas to the curb and remove extermination of the Jews from their states objectives.

I am curious, what map lines do you believe in - where is your baseline for this region? For example I have taken some inspiration from the below video, which is fascinating.

(Edited for clarity with word in brackets)

It’s not widely accepted…it’s what Israel wants you to think. That the earth was created on Oct 7th and a bunch of savages just decided to shoot and hack apart hundreds of Israelis. But anybody who knows anything about the region and is being honest knows that Oct 7th was a show of resistance, and white westerners don’t get to tell oppressed peoples how to resist, especially in a hopeless situation. Hamas carried out atrocities undeniably, but that’s because their land is being taken from them, their people massacred, the economy embargoed, and their children imprisoned, all because Israel wants their land.

Don’t believe me? Do a Google search of the West Bank. No Hamas there, and yet…

Well, the Palestinians who don’t have an army can’t get rid of Hamas, who are partially funded by Israel. Hamas tends to discourage such things. As for getting genocide out of the charter, sure, but that’s just talk. Hamas can never accomplish that. But you know what power can and is accomplishing genocide? You’ll never guess.

Ive made an attempt to open the floor to reasoned discussion, but you are clearly very passionate about the subject and want to continue in a vein that I do not consider constructive or enlightening. With that I will disengage and I hope any further discussion does not result in destructive mud slinging about a topic none of us have any power over

1 Like

Yes, I’m passionate, but I’m also informed AF. I was quite on the other side before I actually visited the region. And I only piped up in response to Baelnor’s comment on immigration, and I’m very familiar with generic western response to this topic, believe me.

1 Like

My problem is I don’t know what ought to happen. So I can be confident that I can’t accept what I’m seeing, but I’ve no idea what to call for to replace it, in part because there are excellent reasons to distrust the information available, and in part because I have so little ability to guess at the outcomes of any choice anyone involved could make. Even trying to think of who the relevant parties are whose choices I could be judging sends me down a rabbit hole of doubting every answer I come up with.

I’ll tell you what, though: the closest I ever get to abandoning consequentialism is when I consider deliberately hurting children to incentivize adults. Never doing that seems like a hell of a good rule, consequences be damned.

2 Likes

Israel are causing huge casualties and damage - very heavy handed.

Genocide - the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.

100% agree that they are seeking to destroy Hamas. Not sure that it is the goal to kill 8 million Palestinians in either Gaza or West Bank. I do recall some of the treaties on the table over the years defined the borders for each group, but weren’t accepted.

I am curious what lines you are thinking should be in play?

No, Israel is not trying to destroy Hamas, they are trying to destroy Gaza. Sure, killing Hamas militants is gravy, but bombing civilian population centers is not the way to do it. Israeli politicians have made it clear repeatedly that they consider Palestinian civilians guilty. Which they are…of being Palestinian.

I don’t see that discussing borders does any good. The real question is when will Israel officially annex Gaza, and what will be the fate of the surviving Gazans?

1 Like

Do you think that’s the end game? Israel pulled out of Gaza in mid 2000’s, but return regularly to “eliminate threats”.

I hadn’t thought that might be the end game. West Bank, sure, I can see that - holy sites plus land continuation - but Gaza? Doesn’t seem as if the risk is worth the reward?

You can’t look at what’s going on and think it is purely a military offensive. Not unless you think the majority of people living in Gaza are all full-blown Hamas operatives. Given the strength of Hamas, which I have never seen estimated as higher than 40,000, there have been far more casualties than that, so either Hamas has been totally destroyed and the war is over, or Israel is bombing the living shit out of civilians indiscriminately. Yes, this is partly down to where Hamas sites itself, but it’s not exactly pushing the Israelis to be more discriminating is it.

It’s pointless to start pointing fingers about ‘atrocities’ seeing as both sides swap them regularly. Israel is keen to grab land and has been openly carrying out ethnic cleansing since the Nakba. I absolutely think Israel should exist, and I also believe the point where it was an existential struggle for Israel is long past; they have nuclear weapons now, and the region is too fractured to ever unite against them again. I understand they want to guarantee their existence, and they obviously are willing to go to any lengths to do so, but it’s currently counter-productive. They are taking dangerous steps into the moral void as an oppressor. They deserve their homeland, but not at any expense.

2 Likes

I am just going to say that I really appreciate @Snotty128’s attempt to explain the challenge with the discourse here.

I am also impressed with @Natus ability to keep dragging people back into this conversation.

“Eliminate threats” = “mow the grass” in Israeli parlance = keep the population of Gaza down.

Yes, it is the endgame. Look at all the social media posts from Israelis openly celebrating their return to Gaza, what outlets will be built where, and how great the beaches will be. Israel has totally destroyed the Gazan infrastructure…what is left?

I’m not dragging, I’m posting. This discourse need not be challenging. Absent of propaganda and western wish fulfillment, it’s VERY easy to see what is going on.

@Natus, do you have a preferred alternative?

Alternative to what, precisely?

Thanks for sharing - I haven’t seen any of that propaganda with respect to celebrating a return to Gaza. Feel free to link / share / dm me some reading or watching mateial and I can expand my knowledge.

I do enjoy (sometimes) the insights from Ben Shapiro, and one of his points of view is that Israel have moved out of Gaza in mid 2000’s and have no intent to take control - just remove the terrorist organization Hamas from power.

@kennfusion - It’s more me seeking to understand than being drawn in :slight_smile:

@Natus - Any chance you share what should happen with respect to lines on a map? Is there any acceptable truce / negotiated outcome you think should be on the cards?

1 Like

@Baelnor it’s just a lot of posts from Israeli accounts on social media, both politicians and IDF. They think Gaza is theirs. It’s from the river to the sea, but reversed! All of a sudden, it’s not antisemitic anymore.

As for Ben Shapiro, you couldn’t be reading anyone more toxic generally or more genocidal towards the Palestinians. If that’s your starting point, it’s a very short road.

Again, regarding borders, it doesn’t matter anymore. Israel was built on Palestine. There was no Israel before 1948, and what was built was made at the point of a bayonet. So the question of borders is moot. They are whatever Israel says they are now. Vae victis!

I’m not even certain I should be posting in this thread, and I’ll remain civil despite the context as I do value this forum and its members very much.

First, to the argument of borders before 1948; this is a rose colored way of looking at things. Let’s also discuss European borders, American borders, Soviet / Russian borders, and all the borders that have changed hands over the course of human history whether through warfare, treaties, or backhanded purchases. Merely stating Israel didn’t exist prior to 1948, full stop, ignores the fact that there used to be a Carthage or whomever else you’d like to pick. Whether or not those moves were moral or ethical is not for me to decide, but Israel was created legally.

My other point is as a Jew who lost family during the Holocaust. There’s something that’s passed along in DNA that some simply cannot understand; the feeling of never having a home and knowing that despite best efforts to contribute to the country where you live, at some point it will turn against you. This has been the case since the dawn of Judaism. I think - emphasis on think here as it’s merely imho - that Israel and its population are very driven by the idea of never again. Jews were attacked in a horrific manner in a place where, again, we thought we were safe. The response is heavy handed because now we have the ability to be that way, as cruel or misguided as it may be.

I don’t think Israel wants Gaza (again imho). But I do believe Israel never wants it to be a haven or breeding ground for terrorism again.

This sounded better and more eloquent in my head fwiw. On a more upbeat note, Merry Christmas all - hope it’s a safe, happy, and healthy one.

3 Likes

I think that helps me get a sense for where you’re coming from. It sounds like you’re not attempting to propose an alternative, so the gap between what you think ought to happen and what is happening isn’t an issue for you. I can understand wanting to find the questions on which clarity is possible and build consensus around those.

Appreciate you sharing your starting point - with that as the basis I can see where you are coming from as well as understand your passion. This was how the conflict was taught to me as well.

With that as the base line, I can’t ever understand a potential solution, and expect to see this as an eternal conflict unless people can try and find a pathway to coexistence. There’s have been a number of times they got close,