The Glass Teat, or 'Television'

Resident Alien. The second season is lacking some of the freewheeling delight in watching Alan Tudyk navigate human society, but it also has some additional depth and complexity, and moral ambiguity. Sara Tomko especially, but the majority of the supporting cast, are good in their supporting roles, and do an often thankless task of being a foil for Tudyk’s strangeness. I still enjoy every scene.

Jujutsu Kaisen. A bit too light-hearted for my current mood. I am still looking for a more serious watch as I can see the end of Attack on Titan coming for me. Teen gains curse-fighting powers, joins curse-fighting school. Standard.

Well, the Amazon Lord of the Rings trailer just aired and I’m pretty worried that Amazon is gonna to go to LotR what they did to Wheel if Time.

1 Like

Yes, but could it be any worse than the Jackson Hobbit films?

1 Like

Unfortunately I think that answer is “yes.” Here’s how I view it at least:

The original LotR trilogy is the product of someone who clearly loved and respected the source material. Yes, there were significant changes made - some things were cut from the story and some were added - but much of this was done in an attempt to adapt the original story to a movie trilogy, with all the constraints and story-telling conventions that that entails. Fidelity can be debated ad nauseum, and has in the internet, but at the end of the day I truly thought Jackson was trying to make Tolkien’s world.

The Hobbit trilogy is the product of a movie studio that wanted to cash in. You can see the bones of what Jackson originally made in there somewhere but you can also see the studio suits interjecting as much as they could to milk the property for what it was worth. I can’t imagine PJ was sitting around wondering how to make an elf-dwarf romance happen before some studio head somewhere said “statistics show that movies with romantic subplots earn 50% more at the box office,” or some other mumbo jumbo. I’m not defending the final product by any means and I wish it was made at the same level of fidelity to the source material as the original trilogy, but it is what it is. There are still some parts of each of the three movies that I absolutely love because I am watching a scene from a beloved book.

The Amazon show looks to follow in the footsteps of WoT where the writers took an IP and decided they can write it better. They’ve already admitted to condensing the 3000-year plot into a single timeframe and creating all-new characters and stories. Visually, I saw almost nothing in the trailer that made me think of Tolkien. I would absolutely love to be proven wrong and I cannot wait to see the final product but my hopes are about as low as they can be, which might actually be to my advantage.

I am a Tolkien enthusiast, to say the least. I even took a college course on Tolkien and his works. The Silmarillion is a goldmine of epic tales, and those are supplemented by many other writings. Why the writers felt the need to make their own stories/characters or to use this IP to “make it for our times,” as one of the producers has said is beyond me.

6 Likes

What is really interesting as I read this, is that while I had no problem with Amazon’s treatment of WoT, I will never forgive that asshat Peter Jackson for changing the very nature of the ring. It was such a fundamental shift, making the ring basically posses ‘victims’ when that was just not the case. (I think I have said this before around here.)

3 Likes

Well, as a fellow Tolkien fan, I don’t want to confuse the issue, so I’ll be more clear.

I thought FotR was solid and except for some neat stuff at Helm’s Deep, the trilogy went south in a hurry. RotK was almost unwatchable.

The Hobbit films were unwatchable, and proved that all of Jackson’s artistry had been poured into FotR and TTT, and he just didn’t care any more.

I totally agree with you that the trailer makes this look really cheap and low quality. I’m a huge Silmarillion fan (I prefer it to LotR) and I will avoid it. I can only imagine what the western culture MAGA gatekeepers are saying about the multi-ethnic casting, the only thing I like about the trailer.

4 Likes

This what killed it for me. I’ve been watching TV fantasy for decades, so Valar knows I can forgive cheap production values and bad acting, but amazon seems to have zero interest in Tolkien for anything but using his name on the marquee. Unless this is much better than the trailer would indicate, I think amazon is perhaps clueless about how to do fantasy.

4 Likes

FWIW, I only read The Silmarillion once, in my teens, I think, and found it a slog. I tried reading some of the other Christopher Tolkien-edited stuff once, and it was even worse; I did not finish. So, for me, the idea of someone approaching the stories therein with little reverence, instead prioritizing audience experience, sounds like about the best I could hope for. I found TWoT exciting and fun, and look forward to another season. As with The Witcher’s gold dragon, I can forgive the occasional scene in which budget has clear impacts on the effect quality if there are also some nice exteriors with pleasant natural scenery.

What I would really like is for them not to rush too much. Reacher was fine, in a kind of stupid way, but some of the details pulled me out of it to the extent that it was always a few steps from engrossing. Set dressing, for example, reflected very little consideration of characters’ lives beyond the most superficial impressions. I feel like The Silmarillion has fewer well-developed ancillary properties (illustrations, games, etc.) than LotR, so it’s got less scaffolding for thinking about how things ought to look and connect. So that problem of making it feel like a world will be all the more difficult. Since so much of what sets Tolkien apart is his investment in parts of the history, myths, and language, I fear that mediocre work on the visual identity and sense of place would stick out all the more. It seems like it would take a lot of work, ideally with fewer people thinking it through over a longer period of time rather than a massive staff for a short while, to get that stuff up to scratch. And it feels like the way licensing windows tend to work means that losing a ton of time to the pandemic means they’re unlikely to have a team thinking carefully about stuff like what sorts of wood the dwarves of a particular city would have access to, or what techniques might shape the architectural options of the Númenóreans.

I can’t see the series working, at all. It will pay lip service to Tolkien and then do its own thing. There’s no way to turn what is essentially Tolkien’s Bible into a snappy little series. You have to lose the breadth and scope, and then you’re left with some very bare bones, which you then have to flesh out. Unfortunately the people doing the fleshing out are not interested in Tolkien’s ethos or work.

4 Likes

TWoT

I couldn’t read the rest, I was too busy immaturely giggling to myself

3 Likes

Also, I finally got around to watching the Reacher finale, and that was kind of a mess. But it leaned pretty deliberately into its cultural payload, which I kind of respect? They’re so up-front about it, even going so far as to promote the ideal that men may cry, but only about the death of their mother, and even then only when no one’s looking, that it seems like they’re trying to invite critical reflection on it without pissing off the people who are watching precisely to avoid reflection. It’s such a weird line to walk. It’s almost like someone wrote a series with the premise “What if toxic masculinity were good, actually?”, and a bunch of people who mostly thought that was revolting agreed to turn it into a TV show because money.

2 Likes

The Woman in the House Across the Street from the Girl in the Window. Agreeably twisty thriller with Kristen Bell up to a point, the point being the denouement where Mrs StC and I uttered a heartfelt oh fuuuuckkk offf.

Haven. Supernatural goings-on in a Maine town where the protagonist, newly-arrived FBI agent Audrey Parker, is more involved than she suspects. This was a rewatch, proper comfort viewing, Apparently lots of Easter eggs for Stephen King fans if you like that kind of thing.

3 Likes

Ars Technica on the Rings of Power trailer.

Good, it’s one of the lost nuances of the film that Galadriel has been through ice and war and isn’t just some tree elf

What?

No no, you are delving too deeply in the originality mines. Might he even be a love interest?

i.e. people who’ve read the books

Real pedants will note he’s only specifically credited with the Three.

well, yes

of course they fucking did

Faithful to the books?

I‘m sure I’ve read this concept before. What’s his name? Stroller? Orogarn?

Because a work that covers vast spans of time where deeds echo down through memory is toooo haaaaard.

i.e. people who’ve read the bloody books, you insufferable patronising twat

Tolkien? Never heard of him. Was he the script guy for Peter?

7 Likes

“We talked with the Tolkien estate,” Payne told Vanity Fair. “If you are true to the exact letter of the law, you are going to be telling a story in which your human characters are dying off every season because you’re jumping 200 years in time, and then you’re not meeting really big, important canon characters until season four.

SO WHY ARE YOU ADAPTING IT THEN YOU CUNT.

7 Likes

If I could spam hearts for you two I would…

3 Likes

If Nicolas Hoult hadn’t turned into a zombie, he’d be rolling over in his grave right now.

1 Like

Your posting is the best thing I’ve read on the internet today!

2 Likes

Every time I think I can no longer bear to exist I find something good to enjoy, or another season comes out.


Thank you Righteous Gemstones.

1 Like

Love every second of this show

1 Like

Vox Machina. As much as I feel Critical Role is a rather cynical ice pick into a suit of armour that has more holes than it has armour, the cast are undeniably good and they pull off the kind of cod fantasy escapades you do see with roleplaying, including jarring changes of tone, anachronism, and an adventure that doesn’t really make a lot of sense. Easy viewing.